I certainly believe some of the philosophical arguments can change someone's religious convictions. Take Fred Hoyle and Freeman Dyson, for instance. They both had their religious views altered after witnessing some philosophical truths to Intelligent Design in their experiments and observations.
I think the whole concept of Miracles is left out of the philosophical arguments. Such things and immaculate conception and stigmata are difficult to explain and so far, no scientific explanation has been made, except for some instances of stigmata which were proved to be fake.
1 comment:
There are certainly some incompatibilities between the two sorts of argument, which you point to here. Although the example of HOyle and Dyson suggests some form of mutual influence
Post a Comment